SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FOOD 5117/CEIC 8319

MINOR Project

 

SESSIONS 1 & 2, 2006

 

 

 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

                                                                                                                                     Page

·      COURSE STAFF                                                                                                       3
including a list of students and their supervisors, so that you can find out
the person with whom you will be working,

·      COURSE INFORMATION                                                                                       4
 giving general information about the subjects, their relationships and aims

·      ASSESSMENT                                                                                                          4
providing details of assessment components, work books, and prizes,                           

·      ACADEMIC HONESTY AND PLAGIARISM                                                         7
defining requirements for intellectual honesty

·      COURSE SCHEDULE                                                                                               9
providing a timetable for your course components

·      RESOURCES FOR STUDENTS                                                                               9
offering assistance on seminars and thesis

·      CONTINUAL COURSE IMPROVEMENT                                                              9
describing our efforts to improve the course each year, and

·      ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS                                                                                9
including details of School policies, health and safety and cleanup.

 

I will be your contact for the TWO projects CEIC 8320/FOOD 5127.

 

 

 

Jayashree Arcot

 

Co-ordinator of Masters Coursework programs (8033, 8016)

 


Course staff

 

You will be supervised by a member of academic staff in the school either in Session 1 or Session 2. Please contact academic staff in the school (CEIC staff for CEIC projects and Food Science staff for FOOD projects) to discuss possible literature review projects and confirm topic and supervisor by week 2 in session 1 or session 2 depending on your enrolment in the course. Regular meetings with the supervisor then on are important for reviewing your progress.

 

Your academic supervisor will assist you in choosing a topic for research and should be the first point of contact to obtain information or resolve problems relating to the performance of the project. Please contact the course coordinator (Jayashree Arcot: j.arcot@unsw.edu.au, Ph: 9385 5360) for assistance with administrative details relating to the course.

 

The supervision of the project is left to the academic staff member, who has control over all aspects of the project. The responsibility for progress in the project is yours alone; your supervisor will give you advice and arrange workspace, chemicals and equipment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Course information

 

The minor project allows you to undertake a literature search on a particular topic of study in food science and technology or chemical engineering or industrial chemistry with guidance from a member of academic staff. You will then have to summarise the information and put it together as a review on the topic and present it as a minor project report (ring-bound) at the end of the session. Follow instructions on how to write the thesis (a copy given during the induction). The form of the minor project report, however depends on the topic, and will be negotiated between the student and the supervisor. It is strongly recommended that the body of a literature search project be written as a review paper for an appropriate Journal, following the style specified in the Journal’s guidelines. The outcome of a minor project may be quite different from standard scientific writing. It may for example be an educational brochure or an original computer programme.

 

In all cases the report must be in paper form, supported by CD, disk or video where appropriate. The copies of the report must be ring bound.

 

 

 

Assessment

 

The criteria will vary according to the nature of the project and the form of the report. The form of the report has to be discussed with the supervisor. Student performance and the report are assessed by the supervisor only. The students are expected to give a seminar at the end of the session:

 

                                                          FOOD 5117/CEIC 8319

 

Seminar                                                               20%                           

Thesis mark from supervisor                                 50%                           

Thesis mark from assessor                                    30%                           

 

The seminar mark will be averaged from submissions by all staff. Supervisor and Assessor report forms which indicate assessment criteria and weightings will be provided during the induction in week 1 session 1 and 2.

Scholarly enquiry means an ability to locate, assess, organize and, ultimately, make use of information.

 

For your personal records, keep copies of all the documents you submit.

 

Final dates for different components of your research project are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

School due dates for projects starting in Session 1

 

Session 1 2006
Week

Coursework Masters Minor Project
FOOD5117/

CEIC 8319

1 to 2

choose topic

1

Introductory talks

4

*outline

6

 

9

*first draft

12-14

Seminar, final

14

*ring bound thesis

 

 School due dates for projects starting in Session 2

 

Session 2 2006
Week

Coursework Masters Major
FOOD5117/CEIC 8319

1 – 2

choose topic

1

Introductory talks

4

*outline

9

* first draft

12-14

Seminar, final

14

*ring bound thesis

 

*Submit this work to the School Office by 1pm, Friday, of the appropriate week.  The office will keep records and will pass the work to your supervisor.

Except in the case of illness or other extenuating circumstances, assessment items will not normally be accepted after the due date. In the case of the thesis, this means that the student will fail the subject. If any assessment item, e.g. the thesis, is accepted after the due date without any extenuating circumstances, the student will be VERY heavily penalized for every HOUR that it is late. You MUST meet deadlines for submission of assessment components.

 

This is a quote from School policy:
'The deadline for submission of Masters Coursework research projects is fixed by the course coordinator and cannot be changed by the project supervisor. Requests for extensions must be made through a formal application for special consideration through the school.'

Project outline

 

The student should submit a draft of the project outline to the School Office. The project outline (maximum 5 x A4 double-space typed pages) is a basis for discussion of design of the project with the supervisor. It should contain:

·      Background and justification for project 

·      Principal aims 

·      Timetable for the project consistent with the School due dates

 

Introduction and literature survey

 

The student should submit a double-spaced draft of the thesis Introduction and Literature Survey to the School Office. The Supervisor will assess, correct and give general guidance on content and style of writing. This draft will be further refined for inclusion in the bound thesis.

 

 

Seminars

The seminars will be presented at the end of sessions 1 and 2. Only one seminar presentation is expected from each student.

Students are expected to contribute to discussions by way of questions and comments on other students’ presentations. The development of skills both in the asking of pertinent questions and answering them is vital to your professional development. It is not solely for staff to comment and ask questions.

      Seminar presents a summary of findings from the literature collected. It is a 15-minute seminar: 12 minutes presentation, then 3 minute discussion.

      Attendance of students at all seminars is compulsory.
Marks will be lost for non-attendance.

 

Seminars are marked by all academic staff and students in attendance, on the basis of half marks for content and half marks for presentation. In assessing content, critical assessment of literature and the ability to answer questions are considered. In assessing presentation, the level, extent and relevance are considered.

 

Good performance in seminars is especially important, since it gives a strong impression of your abilities to academic staff (and other students!). In the outside world, skillful presentation of yourself and your efforts is a crucial aspect of success. Your supervisor will help you plan and organize the seminar(s).

 

 

First draft of the thesis         

 

Drafts should be submitted to the supervisor 4-6 weeks before the due date to allow time for corrections, editing and general guidance on how to conduct scientific writing.  Failure to do this may result in a poor quality thesis that will be downgraded by the assessor.

 

 

Bound copies of the thesis

 

The student submits the ring-bound thesis to the School Office. There is a minimum of two: one copy to the School, one to the supervisor.

 

Archival CD

 

The original thesis files, plus a copy of the thesis in pdf format should be burned on an archival quality CD and submitted within one week of submitting the thesis.

 

 

Academic honesty and plagiarism

 

The University of New South Wales views plagiarism extremely seriously, and there have been several court cases involving plagiarism at Australian universities. Please take careful note of the summary provided below by UNSW for guidance of students:

 

What is Plagiarism?

Plagiarism is the presentation of the thoughts or work of another as one’s own.*  Examples include:

 

·         direct duplication of the thoughts or work of another, including by copying material, ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document (whether published or unpublished), composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or software, web site, Internet, other electronic resource, or another person’s assignment without appropriate acknowledgement;

·         paraphrasing another person’s work with very minor changes keeping the meaning, form and/or progression of ideas of the original;

·         piecing together sections of the work of others into a new whole;

·         presenting an assessment item as independent work when it has been produced in whole or part in collusion with other people, for example, another student or a tutor; and

·         claiming credit for a proportion a work contributed to a group assessment item that is greater than that actually contributed.†

 

For the purposes of this policy, submitting an assessment item that has already been submitted for academic credit elsewhere may be considered plagiarism.

 

Knowingly permitting your work to be copied by another student may also be considered to be plagiarism.

 

Note that an assessment item produced in oral, not written, form, or involving live presentation, may similarly contain plagiarised material.

 

The inclusion of the thoughts or work of another with attribution appropriate to the academic discipline does not amount to plagiarism.

 

The Learning Centre website is main repository for resources for staff and students on plagiarism and academic honesty.  These resources can be located via:

 

www.lc.unsw.edu.au/plagiarism

 

The Learning Centre also provides substantial educational written materials, workshops, and tutorials to aid students, for example, in:

·         correct referencing practices;

·         paraphrasing, summarising, essay writing, and time management;

·         appropriate use of, and attribution for, a range of materials including text, images, formulae and concepts.

 

Individual assistance is available on request from The Learning Centre.

 

Students are also reminded that careful time management is an important part of study and one of the identified causes of plagiarism is poor time management.  Students should allow sufficient time for research, drafting, and the proper referencing of sources in preparing all assessment items.

 

* Based on that proposed to the University of Newcastle by the St James Ethics Centre.  Used with kind permission from the University of Newcastle

Adapted with kind permission from the University of Melbourne.

 

 

If you take an idea or a few words of text from a source, it is sufficient to reference the fact by inserting a reference number (numerical referencing system) or the name of the author and year in brackets (Harvard referencing system). If you take more than a few words from a source, the text should be placed in inverted commas or a different font/style, so that it is clear that the words you use are not your own, and the text should be referenced as before.

 

Only work carried out during the period of the thesis project can be included in the thesis. Any student who carried out vacation work with a research group in the School is required to make a clean distinction between work before and after commencement of the thesis. A student may reference work carried out previously.

 

All assessment items, including the thesis, should be submitted with a signed assessment cover sheet declaring that the work is free from plagiarism:

 

 

I declare that this assessment item is my own work, except where acknowledged, and has not been submitted for academic credit elsewhere, and acknowledge that the assessor of this item may, for the purpose of assessing this item:

Reproduce this assessment item and provide a copy to another member of the University; and/or,

Communicate a copy of this assessment item to a plagiarism checking service (which may then retain a copy of the assessment item on its database for the purpose of future plagiarism checking).

I certify that I have read and understood the University Rules in respect of Student Academic Misconduct.

Signed: ....................................................date:
  

 

 

 

 

 

Course schedule

 

This will be worked out between the supervisor and the student based on the deadlines to be adhered to.

 

 

Resources for students

 

Your supervisor will advise you of books, journal articles and websites where you may find information as a starting point for your research project. After that, it is your responsibility to search out and evaluate information. The Physical Sciences and Biomedical Sciences Library is helpful and can assist you in learning the techniques of information searching and retrieval (info.library.unsw.edu.au/web/services/teaching.html). The Web of Knowledge (www.isinet.com), the Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org) and the School wiki (wiki.ceic.unsw.edu.au) are useful.

See handouts given during the induction for further information on seminars and thesis

 

Continual course improvement

 

Student feedback is taken seriously and continual improvements are made on the basis of feedback from students, supervisors and external reviewers of our courses. A meeting is held with students each year to discuss course improvements and we will ask you to complete a feedback form when you submit your thesis.

 

If there are any problems, we would like to know about them. Many problems can be rectified simply and long-term solutions can be planned to more difficult problems.

If you would like to make any suggestions for improvements, please contact the course coordinator either by email (j.arcot@unsw.edu.au) or by telephone (02 9385 5360).

 

We want to make your research project an enjoyable and worthwhile experience for both you and the staff of the School.

 

 

 

Administrative Matters

 

Notices will be sent by email to your student email address. You should check regularly for notices.

A policy document is available on the School website (www.ceic.unsw.edu.au), covering issues such as attendance, procedures for submission of assessment items, late submission of assessment items, and advice concerning illness or misadventure.

If you have a disability that requires some adjustment in the teaching or learning environment please discuss your study needs with the course coordinator (Jayashree Arcot, email: j.arcot@unsw.edu.au, telephone: 02 9385 5360) prior to, or at the commencement of, their course, or with the Equity Officer (Disability) in the Equity and Diversity Unit (9385 4734 or www.equity.unsw.edu.au/disabil.html).  Issues to be discussed may include access to materials, signers or note-takers, the provision of services and additional exam and assessment arrangements.  Early notification is essential to enable any necessary adjustments to be made.